A discussion about the life and work of author Christopher Hitchens with his friends and fellow authors: Salman Rushdie, Martin Amis, James Fenton & Ian McEwan.
Watch it here (charlierose.com)
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Join the discussion
Popular Posts
-
Men like Bishop Eddie Long are fouling the legacy of the civil rights movement. By Christopher Hitchens " Passing through Union Stati... -
By Peter Hitchens I can’t really claim that I never notice the extraordinarily spiteful attacks on me which come from one particular qua... -
Comedy Death Ray podcast (1/2) (2/2)
-
Christopher Hitchens and Mark Stephens comment on the possibility to arrest the Pope.
-
The movie's screenwriter goes too far in defending his version of history. By Christopher Hitchens "Brush even a fingertip ag... -
The New York Times - Sunday Book Review Christopher Hitchens reviews ADVENTURES IN THE ORGASMATRON How the Sexual Revolution Came to ... -
Reviewed by Vinton Rafe McCabe / New York Journal of Books “Christopher Hitches has the eye of a painter and the literary skill of a novel...
-
By Christopher Hitchens "When anatomizing revolutions, it always pays to consult the whiskered old veterans. Those trying to master a...
Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Paine
Baruch Spinoza
George Orwell
Bertrand Russell
Leon Trotsky
Rosa Luxemburg
Socrates
A discussion about Christopher Hitchens
April 16, 2012A discussion about the life and work of author Christopher Hitchens with his friends and fellow authors: Salman Rushdie, Martin Amis, James Fenton & Ian McEwan.
Watch it here (charlierose.com)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Very touching conversation with Hitch's most dear friends.
I could hear Hitch smirking.
Lovely discussion.
i guess basically the message of this discussion is "if you connected with hitchens based on any conservative stances he took then screw you you're not wanted". how heartwarming. the hitchens fan club is for liberals only, apparently. Then Salman Rushdie, a man whom I once respected, then proclaims that the man who stood up against liberal apathy toward islam extremism is "not the real hitch". What gives him the right to make that judgement? Very depressing.
Hitchen is facing the wrath of Allah's anger. He denied the existence of God eventhough he had no power over death.
In all of Hitchens' discussion and writing of an anti-religious nature. I can't understand why he so self identified with living 110% on such a wide variety of politics that tend to be psuedo-religious in nature of their existence.
Such as?
Post a Comment