“I'd have to say, not to be a hypocrite, that my life is my writing before it's anything. Because that's who I am and my children come later and that's what they've had to put up with,” he says. Read interview here.
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Join the discussion
Popular Posts
-
Vanity Fair Christopher Hitchens—the incomparable critic, masterful rhetorician, fiery wit, and fearless bon vivant—died today at the ag... -
By Christopher Hitchens "I am sometimes asked whether I ever get tired of debating the faithful. There are two reasons why I never do...
-
By Kenyon Wallace An Ottawa pub has refused to host an Anglican church group’s film night, fearing the movie’s debate over the existence of... -
By WSJ Staff "Speakeasy has been entertaining ourselves the last few days by leafing through a new book that landed on our desk: “The... -
Walnut Creek Patch: Christopher Hitchens and Dinesh D'Souza Say What's So Great About God, Feb 16, 2011 “There’s an inner voic... -
Video by The Richard Dawkins Foundation. Play All Videos
-
William Dembski debated CH at the Prestonwood Baptist Church in Plano, Texas, Nov 18, 2010. Alright, it's on YouTube again.
-
Debate between Christopher Hitchens and Dr. Barry Brummett (Chair, Department of Communication Studies, University of Texas at Austin) on ...
-
By Richard Dawkins On 7 October, I recorded a long conversation with Christopher Hitchens in Houston, Texas, for the Christmas edition o...
Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Paine
Baruch Spinoza
George Orwell
Bertrand Russell
Leon Trotsky
Rosa Luxemburg
Socrates
'My life is my writing ... my children come later'
October 23, 2010“I'd have to say, not to be a hypocrite, that my life is my writing before it's anything. Because that's who I am and my children come later and that's what they've had to put up with,” he says. Read interview here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
there's a comment on the globe page suggesting the choice of soundbyte for headline is rather unfortunate. that kind of analysis seems schoolmarmish, more influenced by the conceptual degradations of advertising and its sibilant whispering of family values than by a move towards constructive human development and better trends for children in adult care.
one of the carry-forwards of the more mawkish features of religious sentiment is this fetish for martyrdom, sacrifice, and slavish devotion. yet empirical report through the last two centuries makes clear, children, like any dependents, are best 'served' when the parent stays true to their own life purpose first, the thing which feeds their sense of moral, personal progress as opposed to denying self-fulfillment in the wearing of a limiting roleplay mask that reduces one to the cliche of 'mother' or 'father' where there was once a full human being.
ironic or not, only when the flame of authenticity as against capitulation to a lesser truth is guarded, or to say this another way, only when a person follows their bliss as a precursor to being of service to those one loves, only then can a parent propose to have anything of substance to offer their children. millions if not billions of offspring are fed a diet of thin-shelled parental roleplay and resentment of its sacrifices where love should be, and worse, they know it.
when people go for the dole of primitive instructional dogmatism, that's when you have parents who think it a virtue to neglect their inner lives and its unadorned truth and so obsess about the proprietaries of their children's. its the cornerstone from which the appalling record of our mistreatment of children has its inception point and continuity.
its not enough to love our children. we love them well by loving and emancipating ourselves first.
thanks to the globe and CH for the interview. its a nice piece that doesn't shirk the grim but doesn't indulge it either.
Hitchens is a bad father, QED.
Sweet and ineffably sad...
Post a Comment