“I'd have to say, not to be a hypocrite, that my life is my writing before it's anything. Because that's who I am and my children come later and that's what they've had to put up with,” he says. Read interview here.
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Join the discussion
Popular Posts
-
Time has come to publish the last post on this site. I've been posting links and articles for three years, and it's been great. I a...
-
Transcript of Hugh Hewitt's interview with CH on July 8. Aired July 13, 2010. HH: Special edition of the Hugh Hewitt Show, which I a... -
..at least for The Daily Hitchens YouTube Channel. I received my second copyright strike in a short time and was informed that "A singl...
-
The taming and domestication of religious faith is one of the unceasing chores of civilization. By Christopher Hitchens A recent blizzar...
-
By Peter Hitchens Peter gives his view on the Blair debate. (Which he hasn't watched or listened to.) "I'm asked to comment...
-
Vanity Fair December 2011 By Christopher Hitchens I f you were to set a competition for the headline most unlikely to appear in an Americ... -
By Christopher Hitchens "When anatomizing revolutions, it always pays to consult the whiskered old veterans. Those trying to master a... -
UPDATE from metalunderground.com: April Fools! Did We Get You? posted Apr 2 2011 "We hope you enjoyed our April fools stories yeste...
-
Our failure to respond to the Serbian atrocities prolonged the slaughter. By Christopher Hitchens "I suppose it is possible that t...
-
When was the last time a conservative NATO army pushed out its highest-ranking officers? By Christopher Hitchens "To read of the s...
Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Paine
Baruch Spinoza
George Orwell
Bertrand Russell
Leon Trotsky
Rosa Luxemburg
Socrates
'My life is my writing ... my children come later'
October 23, 2010“I'd have to say, not to be a hypocrite, that my life is my writing before it's anything. Because that's who I am and my children come later and that's what they've had to put up with,” he says. Read interview here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
there's a comment on the globe page suggesting the choice of soundbyte for headline is rather unfortunate. that kind of analysis seems schoolmarmish, more influenced by the conceptual degradations of advertising and its sibilant whispering of family values than by a move towards constructive human development and better trends for children in adult care.
one of the carry-forwards of the more mawkish features of religious sentiment is this fetish for martyrdom, sacrifice, and slavish devotion. yet empirical report through the last two centuries makes clear, children, like any dependents, are best 'served' when the parent stays true to their own life purpose first, the thing which feeds their sense of moral, personal progress as opposed to denying self-fulfillment in the wearing of a limiting roleplay mask that reduces one to the cliche of 'mother' or 'father' where there was once a full human being.
ironic or not, only when the flame of authenticity as against capitulation to a lesser truth is guarded, or to say this another way, only when a person follows their bliss as a precursor to being of service to those one loves, only then can a parent propose to have anything of substance to offer their children. millions if not billions of offspring are fed a diet of thin-shelled parental roleplay and resentment of its sacrifices where love should be, and worse, they know it.
when people go for the dole of primitive instructional dogmatism, that's when you have parents who think it a virtue to neglect their inner lives and its unadorned truth and so obsess about the proprietaries of their children's. its the cornerstone from which the appalling record of our mistreatment of children has its inception point and continuity.
its not enough to love our children. we love them well by loving and emancipating ourselves first.
thanks to the globe and CH for the interview. its a nice piece that doesn't shirk the grim but doesn't indulge it either.
Hitchens is a bad father, QED.
Sweet and ineffably sad...
Post a Comment