“I'd have to say, not to be a hypocrite, that my life is my writing before it's anything. Because that's who I am and my children come later and that's what they've had to put up with,” he says. Read interview here.
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Join the discussion
Popular Posts
-
Why did so many "experts" declare the Oslo attacks to be the work of Islamic terrorists? By Christopher Hitchens "Having h...
-
via PZ Myers / Pharyngula "Christopher Hitchens was scheduled to appear at the American Atheist convention, but had to cancel because...
-
Glenn Beck's rally was large, vague, moist, and undirected—the Waterworld of white self-pity. One crucial element of the American s... -
"In whatever kind of 'race' life may be, I have very abruptly become a finalist". Christopher speaks out on his cancer i... -
New Statesman: "You may need to set aside the rest of your Saturday to get through this, but here in full is the transcript of the long... -
When was the last time a conservative NATO army pushed out its highest-ranking officers? By Christopher Hitchens "To read of the s... -
By Sam Harris The moment it was announced that Christopher Hitchens was sick with cancer, eulogies began spilling into print and from the ...
-
PZ Meyers response to the Hitchens Watch post 'Hitchens Collaborating In Religious Indoctrination?' "There is a site called C...
-
Vanity Fair December 2011 By Christopher Hitchens I f you were to set a competition for the headline most unlikely to appear in an Americ... -
“To terrify children with the image of hell...to consider women an inferior creation. Is that good for the world?” - Christopher Hitchens. ...
Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Paine
Baruch Spinoza
George Orwell
Bertrand Russell
Leon Trotsky
Rosa Luxemburg
Socrates
'My life is my writing ... my children come later'
October 23, 2010“I'd have to say, not to be a hypocrite, that my life is my writing before it's anything. Because that's who I am and my children come later and that's what they've had to put up with,” he says. Read interview here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
there's a comment on the globe page suggesting the choice of soundbyte for headline is rather unfortunate. that kind of analysis seems schoolmarmish, more influenced by the conceptual degradations of advertising and its sibilant whispering of family values than by a move towards constructive human development and better trends for children in adult care.
one of the carry-forwards of the more mawkish features of religious sentiment is this fetish for martyrdom, sacrifice, and slavish devotion. yet empirical report through the last two centuries makes clear, children, like any dependents, are best 'served' when the parent stays true to their own life purpose first, the thing which feeds their sense of moral, personal progress as opposed to denying self-fulfillment in the wearing of a limiting roleplay mask that reduces one to the cliche of 'mother' or 'father' where there was once a full human being.
ironic or not, only when the flame of authenticity as against capitulation to a lesser truth is guarded, or to say this another way, only when a person follows their bliss as a precursor to being of service to those one loves, only then can a parent propose to have anything of substance to offer their children. millions if not billions of offspring are fed a diet of thin-shelled parental roleplay and resentment of its sacrifices where love should be, and worse, they know it.
when people go for the dole of primitive instructional dogmatism, that's when you have parents who think it a virtue to neglect their inner lives and its unadorned truth and so obsess about the proprietaries of their children's. its the cornerstone from which the appalling record of our mistreatment of children has its inception point and continuity.
its not enough to love our children. we love them well by loving and emancipating ourselves first.
thanks to the globe and CH for the interview. its a nice piece that doesn't shirk the grim but doesn't indulge it either.
Hitchens is a bad father, QED.
Sweet and ineffably sad...
Post a Comment