What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Join the discussion
Popular Posts
-
Vanity Fair Christopher Hitchens—the incomparable critic, masterful rhetorician, fiery wit, and fearless bon vivant—died today at the ag... -
By Christopher Hitchens "I am sometimes asked whether I ever get tired of debating the faithful. There are two reasons why I never do...
-
By Kenyon Wallace An Ottawa pub has refused to host an Anglican church group’s film night, fearing the movie’s debate over the existence of... -
By WSJ Staff "Speakeasy has been entertaining ourselves the last few days by leafing through a new book that landed on our desk: “The... -
Walnut Creek Patch: Christopher Hitchens and Dinesh D'Souza Say What's So Great About God, Feb 16, 2011 “There’s an inner voic... -
Video by The Richard Dawkins Foundation. Play All Videos
-
William Dembski debated CH at the Prestonwood Baptist Church in Plano, Texas, Nov 18, 2010. Alright, it's on YouTube again.
-
Debate between Christopher Hitchens and Dr. Barry Brummett (Chair, Department of Communication Studies, University of Texas at Austin) on ...
-
By Richard Dawkins On 7 October, I recorded a long conversation with Christopher Hitchens in Houston, Texas, for the Christmas edition o...
Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Paine
Baruch Spinoza
George Orwell
Bertrand Russell
Leon Trotsky
Rosa Luxemburg
Socrates
3 comments:
Imbecilic. It saddens me greatly that even this man, even this great freethinker, even this great slayer of unthinking group identities, has finally fallen neath the thralls of facile nationalism.
That he's been taken in by such easy confirmation bias makes it even more disgusting. This can easily be proved: on his own world view, Einstein has very little influence and is referenced little in his work. Darwin, by contrast, is far more prominent in Hitchens' writing; but as he's not Jewish, he has been ignored. Even Steven bloody Hawking is mentioned more in God Is Not Great. Secondly, that three of the great influences on modern thought - I'd be cautious in including Freud, mind - were secular Jews attests only to an apparent tendency to be in the élite and to be good at getting their ideas propagated. All this self-indulgent nonsense on stilts about being the great rationalists taking down the edifice of human stupidity, of not drinking so as not to dull the pain, is but a return to the alluring national ego-wanking that should have been killed off in the last century. Disappointing.
Yeah and lets face it Marx Freud and Derrida have not really made us much smarter but have mddied the waters a lot I think.
Is the woman that appears behind him at 2:10 his wife or his daughter?
Post a Comment