What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Join the discussion
Popular Posts
-
The British political class may stop asking the one question that has obsessed it for decades. By Christopher Hitchens "It was about... -
Thanks to Atheist Altar for uploading. March 2009 at Samford University in Birmingham, AL. This debate is for sale on DVD and is every now...
-
Time has come to publish the last post on this site. I've been posting links and articles for three years, and it's been great. I a...
-
One week after the fatwa on Salman Rushdie was issued in 1989, Hitchens appeared on C-SPAN to discuss The Satanic Verses and freedom of spee...
-
Kindle Exclusive "..Hitchens reflects upon the life and death of Osama bin Laden in this sobering Kindle Single." If you don... -
The writings of the martyred socialist Rosa Luxemburg give a plaintive view of history’s paths not taken. By Christopher Hitchens ... -
CH interviewed in his home in Washington D.C by Jeremy Paxman. Broadcasted on Nov 29, 2010. Play Full Interview.
-
Vanity Fair July 2011 By Christopher Hitchens "Hating the United States—which funds Islamabad’s army and nuclear program to the h... -
In the battle for ideas, scientists could learn from Christopher Hitchens. By Michael Shermer " Although he has no formal training in... -
Mox News April 16, 2010. CNN/AC360. Christopher Hitchens debates Tony Perkins on the US Federal District Court ruling that the "Nation...
Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Paine
Baruch Spinoza
George Orwell
Bertrand Russell
Leon Trotsky
Rosa Luxemburg
Socrates
2 comments:
I think we have to admit that Hitch has one really big failing: He is hopefless at putting nails in walls and hanging pictures. there are all resting against wallks. Also, having seen pictures of his study, in which books are piled up like vast literary columns, he isn't too hot in the shelf-mounting business either. But then again, neither am I.
Mr Hitchens,
Why are we to assume that the Jewish people 2000years ago refused Mr Jesus's wisdom for any more than beaurocratic necessity? It is most likely that he was seen as a threat to power to stir a popular uprising by challenging vigorously the cruelly resonant YHWH establishment with a more loving ethic, and thus he was crushed not by the people but by the establishment. As with people in non democratic societies today, the option for free expression does not really exist for the people.
Post a Comment