What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Join the discussion
Popular Posts
-
BE IT RESOLVED, religion is a force for good in the world. This question was put directly to the audience of the Munk Debates on Religion ... -
via PZ Myers / Pharyngula "Christopher Hitchens was scheduled to appear at the American Atheist convention, but had to cancel because...
-
The New York Times | Sunday Book Review "Anyone who occasionally opens one of our more serious periodicals has learned that the bylin...
-
Some questions for the "activists" aboard the Gaza flotilla. By Christopher Hitchens "The tale of the Gaza "flotill...
-
..at least for The Daily Hitchens YouTube Channel. I received my second copyright strike in a short time and was informed that "A singl...
-
Update: Hitchens spotted in D.C. Sunday night. Link here . At reddit.com there are comments on Hitchens having breathing issues at the air...
-
By Stephen Fry Almost as many words have been written about Christopher Hitchens since he died as he would write in a typical working week...
-
Christopher Hitchens debated Rabbi Shmuley at Cooper Union, New York on Thursday, September 16, 2010. Play All 8 Videos
-
Our failure to respond to the Serbian atrocities prolonged the slaughter. By Christopher Hitchens "I suppose it is possible that t...
-
I've created another YT channel. When I posted my thoughts on not starting a new Hitchens YT channel, I was thinking of the massive work...
Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Paine
Baruch Spinoza
George Orwell
Bertrand Russell
Leon Trotsky
Rosa Luxemburg
Socrates
2 comments:
I think we have to admit that Hitch has one really big failing: He is hopefless at putting nails in walls and hanging pictures. there are all resting against wallks. Also, having seen pictures of his study, in which books are piled up like vast literary columns, he isn't too hot in the shelf-mounting business either. But then again, neither am I.
Mr Hitchens,
Why are we to assume that the Jewish people 2000years ago refused Mr Jesus's wisdom for any more than beaurocratic necessity? It is most likely that he was seen as a threat to power to stir a popular uprising by challenging vigorously the cruelly resonant YHWH establishment with a more loving ethic, and thus he was crushed not by the people but by the establishment. As with people in non democratic societies today, the option for free expression does not really exist for the people.
Post a Comment