Thanks to Atheist Altar for uploading.
March 2009 at Samford University in Birmingham, AL. This debate is for sale on DVD and is every now and then uploaded and after a while removed from YouTube. In case you haven't watched this debate, here's your chance. My guess is that it won't be on YT for long.
(1/12)
Available at The Hitch Shop!
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.

Welcome to an unofficial Christopher Hitchens site. dailyhitchens@post.com
Christopher Hitchens (1949 - 2011) was an Anglo-American author and journalist. His books made him a prominent public intellectual and a staple of talk shows and lecture circuits. He was a columnist and literary critic at Vanity Fair, Slate, The Atlantic, World Affairs, The Nation, Free Inquiry and a variety of other media outlets. He was named one of the world's "Top 100 Public Intellectuals" by Foreign Policy and Britain's Prospect.
Yahoo! News
Wikipedia
Search results
Recent Comments
Popular Posts
-
The DSK case and the silly stereotypes about American and European morals. By Christopher Hitchens "Why is that we cannot read any ...
-
The administration's inadequate response to the crisis in Libya reveals a lack of courage and principle. By Christopher Hitchens ...
-
In Stock. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com . Gift-wrap available. Product Description The first new book of essays by Christopher Hitch...
-
William Dembski debated CH at the Prestonwood Baptist Church in Plano, Texas, Nov 18, 2010. As some of you have noticed, the debate was upl...
-
Time has come to publish the last post on this site. I've been posting links and articles for three years, and it's been great. I a...
-
Vanity Fair | January 2012 By Christopher Hitchens When it came to it, and old Kingsley suffered from a demoralizing and disorienting fal...
-
In the battle for ideas, scientists could learn from Christopher Hitchens. By Michael Shermer " Although he has no formal training in...
-
The New York Times - Sunday Book Review Christopher Hitchens reviews ADVENTURES IN THE ORGASMATRON How the Sexual Revolution Came to ...
-
The great polemicist is certain to be remembered, but perhaps not as he would like. By George Eaton "Nothing concentrates the mind ...
-
Our failure to respond to the Serbian atrocities prolonged the slaughter. By Christopher Hitchens "I suppose it is possible that t...

Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Paine

Baruch Spinoza

George Orwell

Bertrand Russell

Leon Trotsky

Rosa Luxemburg

Socrates
Is God Great? - Christopher Hitchens vs. John Lennox
July 28, 2010Posted by Tom at 09:37
Labels: 2009, Christopher Hitchens, Is God Great, John Lennox
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Interesting essay here:
Until I read this memoir I had always registered Hitchens's doubleness as evidence of the fine balance of his mind, the scrupulousness of his politics, which in those days and for years afterward could best be summed up as anti-imperialist. In a 1976 essay ostensibly about Guernica, he begins with a paradox: "There is the atrocity of war, and the atrocity in war." Then he dismantles it: "For the purpose of analyzing a fascist attack on democracy, the distinction is a phony one. The tactics derived from the strategy; the strategy was neither just a military operation nor simply a war crime. Like My Lai, it was both; and like My Lai, inevitably so." I can still remember the first time I noticed the Hitchens byline—on a dispatch from Northern Ireland in the New Statesman as remarkable for the absence of cant about either the IRA or the British government as for its style. Here was a reporter who refused to pander to his readers' prejudices at the same time his indiscreet and densely (historically and literarily) allusive prose seemed to put a pleasingly high estimate on one's intelligence. Here, crucially, was an avowedly left-wing writer who regarded it as no part of his job to accept or purvey bullshit from "our side," heeding instead Trotsky's view that the "professional ethics of a correspondent" are best summed up in two words: "Don't lie!"
...
Yet when contrarianism becomes not just a habit but a method, the line between having no illusions and having no ideals can be tricky to discern. Hitchens's brief, unhappy flirtation with David Irving—which waxed with the assurance in June 1996 that Irving was "not just a Fascist historian. He is also a great historian of Fascism" and waned five years later with the revelation that Irving had fabricated evidence, fiddled figures and favored Hitchens's younger daughter with a recital of racist doggerel—is as good an object lesson as any in the perils of parlor iconoclasm. I don't think Hitchens doubted the reality of Auschwitz even for a second. Rather, his eagerness to épater the literal-minded, spurred by an awareness of the ways the Holocaust has been exploited as a shield for Israeli intransigence, led him to neglect the signs that should have warned him off Irving.
http://www.thenation.com/article/38011/changing-places?page=0,0
Post a Comment