Thanks to Atheist Altar for uploading.
March 2009 at Samford University in Birmingham, AL. This debate is for sale on DVD and is every now and then uploaded and after a while removed from YouTube. In case you haven't watched this debate, here's your chance. My guess is that it won't be on YT for long.
(1/12)
Available at The Hitch Shop!
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Welcome to an unofficial Christopher Hitchens site. dailyhitchens@post.com
Christopher Hitchens (1949 - 2011) was an Anglo-American author and journalist. His books made him a prominent public intellectual and a staple of talk shows and lecture circuits. He was a columnist and literary critic at Vanity Fair, Slate, The Atlantic, World Affairs, The Nation, Free Inquiry and a variety of other media outlets. He was named one of the world's "Top 100 Public Intellectuals" by Foreign Policy and Britain's Prospect.
Yahoo! News
Wikipedia
Search results
Recent Comments
Popular Posts
-
Prolific writer and political journalist Christopher Hitchens will release a new book this September titled Arguably: Essays by Christopher ...
-
BE IT RESOLVED, religion is a force for good in the world. This question was put directly to the audience of the Munk Debates on Religion ...
-
Los Angeles Times Contrarian social critic Christopher Hitchens, rocker Patti Smith and novelist Jonathan Franzen are among the finalist...
-
Ignore Yoko Ono and John Lennon, and heed George Orwell's tea-making advice. By Christopher Hitchens "Now that "the hol...
-
By Christopher Hitchens "Forfeiting a both-houses Republican victory, rational conservatives ignored or excused the most hateful kind...
-
PZ Meyers response to the Hitchens Watch post 'Hitchens Collaborating In Religious Indoctrination?' "There is a site called C...
-
Aug 22, 2010. Rabbi Shmuley discusses cancer, religion, Hitch22, and prayers with CH. Play 2 Videos
-
Stephen Fry and Christopher Hitchens debate blasphemy at the Guardian Hay Festival in 2005.
-
A history of the Baghdad Express illuminates the resilience of politicized Islam. By Christopher Hitchens "FEW MOMENTS IN the anna...
-
UPDATE ! "Please note: due to Christopher Hitchens' health challenges, he will be participating in the debate via video link rather...
Is God Great? - Christopher Hitchens vs. John Lennox
July 28, 2010Posted by Tom at 09:37
Labels: 2009, Christopher Hitchens, Is God Great, John Lennox
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Interesting essay here:
Until I read this memoir I had always registered Hitchens's doubleness as evidence of the fine balance of his mind, the scrupulousness of his politics, which in those days and for years afterward could best be summed up as anti-imperialist. In a 1976 essay ostensibly about Guernica, he begins with a paradox: "There is the atrocity of war, and the atrocity in war." Then he dismantles it: "For the purpose of analyzing a fascist attack on democracy, the distinction is a phony one. The tactics derived from the strategy; the strategy was neither just a military operation nor simply a war crime. Like My Lai, it was both; and like My Lai, inevitably so." I can still remember the first time I noticed the Hitchens byline—on a dispatch from Northern Ireland in the New Statesman as remarkable for the absence of cant about either the IRA or the British government as for its style. Here was a reporter who refused to pander to his readers' prejudices at the same time his indiscreet and densely (historically and literarily) allusive prose seemed to put a pleasingly high estimate on one's intelligence. Here, crucially, was an avowedly left-wing writer who regarded it as no part of his job to accept or purvey bullshit from "our side," heeding instead Trotsky's view that the "professional ethics of a correspondent" are best summed up in two words: "Don't lie!"
...
Yet when contrarianism becomes not just a habit but a method, the line between having no illusions and having no ideals can be tricky to discern. Hitchens's brief, unhappy flirtation with David Irving—which waxed with the assurance in June 1996 that Irving was "not just a Fascist historian. He is also a great historian of Fascism" and waned five years later with the revelation that Irving had fabricated evidence, fiddled figures and favored Hitchens's younger daughter with a recital of racist doggerel—is as good an object lesson as any in the perils of parlor iconoclasm. I don't think Hitchens doubted the reality of Auschwitz even for a second. Rather, his eagerness to épater the literal-minded, spurred by an awareness of the ways the Holocaust has been exploited as a shield for Israeli intransigence, led him to neglect the signs that should have warned him off Irving.
http://www.thenation.com/article/38011/changing-places?page=0,0
Post a Comment