What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Join the discussion
Popular Posts
-
via PZ Myers / Pharyngula "Christopher Hitchens was scheduled to appear at the American Atheist convention, but had to cancel because...
-
BE IT RESOLVED, religion is a force for good in the world. This question was put directly to the audience of the Munk Debates on Religion ... -
Update: Hitchens spotted in D.C. Sunday night. Link here . At reddit.com there are comments on Hitchens having breathing issues at the air...
-
..at least for The Daily Hitchens YouTube Channel. I received my second copyright strike in a short time and was informed that "A singl...
-
PZ Meyers response to the Hitchens Watch post 'Hitchens Collaborating In Religious Indoctrination?' "There is a site called C...
-
Aug 22, 2010. Rabbi Shmuley discusses cancer, religion, Hitch22, and prayers with CH. Play 2 Videos
-
Some questions for the "activists" aboard the Gaza flotilla. By Christopher Hitchens "The tale of the Gaza "flotill...
-
The New York Times | Sunday Book Review "Anyone who occasionally opens one of our more serious periodicals has learned that the bylin...
-
By Windsor Mann, editor of “The Quotable Hitchens: From Alcohol to Zionism” It’s hard to say anything about Christopher Hitchens that hasn...
-
By Christopher Hitchens "I am sometimes asked whether I ever get tired of debating the faithful. There are two reasons why I never do...
Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Paine
Baruch Spinoza
George Orwell
Bertrand Russell
Leon Trotsky
Rosa Luxemburg
Socrates
4 comments:
Johnnie Walker Black, guys.
I love it and I think Hitch would of loved it as well.
alexander cockburn is dead, not long after speaking ill of the great christopher hitchens. Read an excellent piece about the ignorant fool entitled 'a bitter life'. The orwell hating son of a soviet double agent hois with his own petard. I'll stop short of saying 'perhaps there's a god after all' and just say...it does make one wonder.
"A bitter life" is an interesting piece, if a little too vehemently anti-Left to be taken as in any way objective.
I do agree though with what he says about that disgusting piece that Cockburn wrote about Hitchens. When Hitchens was tearing into someone, he could be nasty but there was invariably real anger behind it. Cockburn came across as someone who resented Hitchens, his straying from the party line and his increasingly greater fame. That was pretty much confirmed when Cockburn called him an "attention seeker". Talk about projection!
Post a Comment