What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Yahoo! News
Wikipedia
Recent Comments
Popular Posts
-
PZ Meyers response to the Hitchens Watch post 'Hitchens Collaborating In Religious Indoctrination?' "There is a site called C...
-
Update: Kissinger tells JTA: Take remark on gas chambers in context Update by Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic. December 14 ADL: Kissinger...
-
Jeremy Paxman interviews Christopher Hitchens in Washington D.C. Full interview on BBC2, Nov 29, 7.30pm.
-
When was the last time a conservative NATO army pushed out its highest-ranking officers? By Christopher Hitchens "To read of the s...
-
The old parochialism meets the not-so-new isolationism in Michele Bachmann. By Christopher Hitchens "That was actually three drippi...
-
It's April 13th. Some want to call it Christopher Hitchens Day. I agree with Staks Rosch: "While some atheists will be raising a gl...
-
BE IT RESOLVED, religion is a force for good in the world. This question was put directly to the audience of the Munk Debates on Religion ...
-
Description: This is a compendium of quotes of No. 1 "New York Times" bestselling author Christopher Hitchens, arranged by hun...
-
The administration's inadequate response to the crisis in Libya reveals a lack of courage and principle. By Christopher Hitchens ...
-
By Christopher Hitchens "I am sometimes asked whether I ever get tired of debating the faithful. There are two reasons why I never do...
Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Paine
Baruch Spinoza
George Orwell
Bertrand Russell
Leon Trotsky
Rosa Luxemburg
Socrates
Mr. Kissinger, Have You No Shame?
December 27, 2010By Christopher Hitchens
"Until the most recent release of the Nixon/Kissinger tapes, what were the permitted justifications for saying in advance that the slaughter of Jews in gas chambers by a hostile foreign dictatorship would not be "an American concern?"
Read More (Slate)
Posted by Tom at 21:13 40 comments
Labels: 2010, Christopher Hitchens, Henry Kissinger, Slate
The Pak-Af Problem
December 20, 2010Friends of his would enjoy disputing whether his heart or his ego was the larger, but it was sad to know, as Richard Holbrooke's heart eventually burst, that he had strained a good deal of it in upholding a policy in which much of his best advice had been, or was being, ignored.
Read More (Slate)
Posted by Tom at 19:31 1 comments
Labels: 2010, Christopher Hitchens, Slate, The Pak-Af Problem
(1/8) Is There An Afterlife? Christopher Hitchens vs Shmuley Boteach
December 19, 2010Christopher Hitchens debated Rabbi Shmuley at Cooper Union, New York on Thursday, September 16, 2010.
Play All 8 Videos
Posted by Tom at 20:14 11 comments
Labels: 2010, afterlife, atheism, Christopher Hitchens, debate, religion, Shmuley Boteach
Free Speech / Off Topic added
Some DH visitors seem to have an urge to post and express themselves quite off topic to published posts. I've added a comment box where these views can be posted. So, stay on topic when commenting on posts, if you have something else to say, there's this comment box for that. It's a free speech box, so don't bother complaining on possible provocative or insulting comments. It's your choice if you want to go there.
Every now and then one stumbles upon non Hitchens material that one would like to share. A box like this is the appropriate place.
I don't know if this will catch on but it'll be an option for a while, if no comments are posted, I'll simply remove it.
The Hitch on Death
December 18, 2010Christopher Hitchens, brooding on “how much faster I’m dying than anyone else” is interviewed by Oliver Kamm in today’s Times (pay wall).
Read More (independent.co.uk)
Posted by Tom at 16:04 17 comments
Labels: 2010, Christopher Hitchens, interview, Oliver Kamm
Christopher Hitchens and me
BY SOPHIE TARNOWSKA
"I met writer and polemicist Christopher Hitchens for the first time in 2008, here in Montreal. When I saw him again last month at the Munk debates in Toronto, I was shocked at the change cancer had wrought. He'd been diagnosed with esophageal cancer -the same cancer that had killed his father -this past June during the promotional tour for his memoir, Hitch-22."
Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/Christopher+Hitchens/3997097/story.html#ixzz18TGID5U2
Posted by Tom at 15:52 1 comments
Labels: 2010, Christopher Hitchens, Sophie Tarnowska
Christopher Hitchens’s Jewish Problem
December 17, 2010I didn't first pay much attention to this and it's now a few days old but since it has made headlines on other blogs and sites, and in case you missed it and are interested, read Benjamin Kerstein's article here. (jewishideasdaily.com)
Posted by Tom at 04:55 31 comments
Labels: 2010, Benjamin Kerstein, Christopher Hitchens, Jews
The Blair - Hitchens event in Toronto
December 15, 2010By Peter Hitchens
Peter gives his view on the Blair debate. (Which he hasn't watched or listened to.)
"I'm asked to comment on my brother's encounter (styled by some a 'debate') with Anthony Blair in Toronto, recently broadcast on BBC radio. Delighted as I am that the BBC (which can and often does reduce an important Parliamentary event to three jokey minutes) has taken to broadcasting debates on major issues on Radio 4, I do wonder whether the habit will last, and why this particular one made it so swiftly on to the air."
Read More (http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk)
Thanks swh
Posted by Tom at 22:36 11 comments
Labels: 2010, Christopher Hitchens, debate, Peter Hitchens, Tony Blair
How Can Anyone Defend Kissinger Now?
December 13, 2010Update: Kissinger tells JTA: Take remark on gas chambers in context
Update by Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic. December 14
ADL: Kissinger's Vile Words Means Nothing
The Nixon tapes remind us what a vile creature Henry Kissinger is.
By Christopher Hitchens
"Over the last few weeks, this modest little column of mine has been acquiring an almost eerie prescience and potency."
Read More (Slate)
Posted by Tom at 18:41 65 comments
Labels: 2010, Christopher Hitchens, Henry Kissinger, Slate
Author Christopher Hitchens in conversation
by Noah Richler
"I don’t think someone is religious unless they have faith in what St. Paul calls the evidence of things not seen—in other words, the supernatural or supervising deity, presence, force who requires and expects certain kinds of propitiation. If that’s not in your mind, then I don’t think you’re really a religious person at all."
Read More (macleans.ca)
Posted by Tom at 18:01 9 comments
Labels: 2010, atheism, Christopher Hitchens, interview, religion
Christopher Hitchens on Vietnam
December 12, 2010CH replies: "I was naturally flattered to have my opinions on the origin of the Vietnam conflict taken so seriously in your recent postings. But this feeling gave way to a sense of bewilderment as I read further. Is it really controversial, anywhere, to assert that United States support for French colonialism was at the root of the disaster?" Continue reading
Shortly after posting Hitchens' reply, Peter Robinson posted this:
Christopher Hitchens Replies: The Background...And My Answer
Posted by Tom at 08:47 23 comments
Labels: 2010, Christopher Hitchens, Michael Labeit, Peter Robinson, ricochet, Vietnam
American Atheists 2011 Convention
December 10, 2010More Info (atheists.org)
Tea’d Off
December 9, 2010"Forfeiting a both-houses Republican victory, rational conservatives ignored or excused the most hateful kind of populist claptrap (e.g., the fetid weirdness of Glenn Beck’s 9/12 Project). The poison they’ve helped disseminate will still be in the American bloodstream when the country needs it least."
Read More (Vanity Fair)
Posted by Tom at 15:01 112 comments
Labels: 2010, Christopher Hitchens, politics, Tea'd Off, Vanity Fair
The Oxford Comment Podcast: Episode 4. Religion.
Listen to the podcast here. (OUP blog)






