BBC Radio 4
By Christopher Hitchens. A selection of the polemical journalist's essays. Read by Roger Allam.
Listen here (15 minutes). Available for 7 days.
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Join the discussion
Popular Posts
-
Mr Steve Wasserman, Christopher Hitchens' literary agent, kindly replied to my query about a possible memorial. Posted with permission. ...
-
Our failure to respond to the Serbian atrocities prolonged the slaughter. By Christopher Hitchens "I suppose it is possible that t...
-
Ignore the recent excuses. Henry Kissinger's entire career was a series of massacres and outrages. By Christopher Hitchens "Un... -
Left or right, a quality scribe By Christopher Caldwell, senior editor at The Weekly Standard. " There is an odd thing about Christo...
-
By Peter Hitchens I can’t really claim that I never notice the extraordinarily spiteful attacks on me which come from one particular qua... -
Tom Cook has a thread on reddit where you can remember Hitchens, and what he meant to you.
-
Watch the debate: Does Atheism Poisons Everything with Christopher Hitchens and David Berlinski on C-SPAN2 here . Hosted by the Fixed P... -
LABOUR councillors are blocking plans to honour campaigning journalist Christopher Hitchens with a statue, with one of them branding the l... -
Vanity Fair Christopher Hitchens—the incomparable critic, masterful rhetorician, fiery wit, and fearless bon vivant—died today at the ag... -
Talk of the Nation. Carol Blue, Hitchens' wife of 20 years, interviewed on NPR by Neal Conan. Listen here . (30 min.)
Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Paine
Baruch Spinoza
George Orwell
Bertrand Russell
Leon Trotsky
Rosa Luxemburg
Socrates
5 comments:
wow has the thinking of hitchens ever changed a lot through the days. his mammoth account of henry kissinger won't change though, but i don't even remember anymore about those previous governments.
may everyone be on their own clock and may everyone smoke their own cigarettes.
Indeed, he himself would tell you that he disagrees with most of what he used to think.
But so what?
What does that tell you?
Well, consider that Indian leaders have made it clear that they, like every other nation, are allowed to have a history; they can transform their Adivasis. The problem is many Adivasis, like the elephants, think they don't belong to Delhi. And not too long after we see that a significant portion of Adivasis make their move, change and agree.
Is it not kinda upside down?
Every intellectual has his or her own history, excepting maybe Chomsky who said he thinks basically the same as he did when he was seven years old. Pretty amazing. Hitchens, I suppose, would probably tell you that the only thing he's ever been against is the idiocy of solipsism. And it builds, if not transparently, in an understanding of the rotten foundation of the greedy and religious.
Well then, to put maturation in deific language - he, if he existed, as the religious often enough dubiously enunciate, would in unmitigated implausibility have had no youth, that is no juvenile stage of private experimentation.
Imagine it as it stands in America, if we connect the torah and bible as the old and new testaments, that god would have himself had to of had something of an nth dimensional awakening (I hesistate to use the word religious for any individual) to send his compassion to the bipedal realm as jesus after a long and lunatically-hormoned delusion, or more simply as just a simple horrendous episode of jealous hatred and blood-spilling racism.
The babblings of the christians, thoroughly it seems unaware of this "the deep incredulity" of the unabridged political bow, are not altogether meaningless to the critical thinker as anti-theists should hope to one day render them, for each believer is an ego groping to add a dimension to his or her badge of honor, whilst in a Scandinavian dungeon of sight helping to threaten civilization in suicidal foreplay.
Further, I think it is not often enough appreciated or admitted how uneducated American people are about un-isming Judaism, since her advocates often enough represent it subjectively as softened poetic natural philosophical introspection. Is there no room in civilization for a demilitarized cultural pasttime? Unfortunately for nature it seems it has been at least usually the clear and present economics and nationalism that dogmatize it as religion, a degenerative and heart-breaking shift in paradigm that only unconditioned introspection could reclaim, as it is as lost upon later generations as is the evolution of human language, for example.
@e.a
I have time to share some footage of events on two tribal groups near the cone of India, if you would suffer to see it.
Post a Comment