Debate between Christopher Hitchens and Dr. Barry Brummett (Chair, Department of Communication Studies, University of Texas at Austin) on the resolution "Religion has been a positive force in culture," June 4, 2011.
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Join the discussion
Popular Posts
-
Why did so many "experts" declare the Oslo attacks to be the work of Islamic terrorists? By Christopher Hitchens "Having h...
-
PZ Meyers response to the Hitchens Watch post 'Hitchens Collaborating In Religious Indoctrination?' "There is a site called C...
-
Update: Kissinger tells JTA: Take remark on gas chambers in context Update by Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic. December 14 ADL: Kissinger... -
"In whatever kind of 'race' life may be, I have very abruptly become a finalist". Christopher speaks out on his cancer i... -
New Statesman: "You may need to set aside the rest of your Saturday to get through this, but here in full is the transcript of the long... -
When was the last time a conservative NATO army pushed out its highest-ranking officers? By Christopher Hitchens "To read of the s... -
“To terrify children with the image of hell...to consider women an inferior creation. Is that good for the world?” - Christopher Hitchens. ... -
Friday, November 26, 2010. Roy Thomson Hall, Toronto, Canada. The official resolution, "Be it resolved, religion is a force of good for...
-
By Sam Harris The moment it was announced that Christopher Hitchens was sick with cancer, eulogies began spilling into print and from the ...
-
via PZ Myers / Pharyngula "Christopher Hitchens was scheduled to appear at the American Atheist convention, but had to cancel because...
Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Paine
Baruch Spinoza
George Orwell
Bertrand Russell
Leon Trotsky
Rosa Luxemburg
Socrates
10 comments:
Thanks, hadn't seen this one before:):)
Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6FxVHc_UBY
Finally! Glad they got this posted for the public.
There are parts 3 and 4 continuing on at the end of each part.
At long last!! Wonder what took Waterloo so long to upload this debate? Anyway, have enjoyed parts 1 and 2 so far; so I guess all is forgiven (on this end)...Looking and sounding good, Hitch, all things considered!
--Karen Olsen
Fantastic. Just really tough to see him like this.
Waterloo Region, home of the Old Order horse and buggy Mennonites and The Perimeter Institute for theoretical physics. How is that for irony? Enjoyed the debate. Thank you Christopher and Dr. Brummett.
Hitch I hope we can see many more debates like this in the future.
On the question about what would give motive/morality in a totally secular world asked by the audience. Didn't television take over that job a long long time ago? Didn't any book apart from religion do the job before that?
We don't idolise the bad characters in films and TV we want to be the white hatted cowboy, this is our moral moral Zeitgeist, or at least a large part of it. Apart from this we have parents, teachers and peers who let us know what is right and wrong what is acceptable and not.
Hitch still the most reliable provider of consistent, stimulating philosophical input. Thanks again for your inspiring words.
BB Health fanatics used as an example of non monotheistic, secular fundamentalism. Is this a valid example? I am not personally impressed with this dismissive reference, viewing it from the perspective of a Sports Scientist ;0))
Uggh he looks really sick, that's hard to watch. I really hope that appearances deceive here.
Post a Comment