tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post7409766006064374439..comments2023-12-19T04:24:35.912+02:00Comments on Daily Hitchens: Tea’d OffUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger112125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-85173560065332835342010-12-13T18:10:47.793+02:002010-12-13T18:10:47.793+02:00And you're a very good driver. Yes, we know.
...<i>And you're a very good driver. Yes, we know.</i><br /><br />I'm an excellent driver.FGFMhttp://twitter.com/FGFMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-33183102007002839602010-12-13T17:50:25.005+02:002010-12-13T17:50:25.005+02:00And you're a very good driver. Yes, we know.And you're a very good driver. Yes, we know.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-57423230195430266382010-12-13T17:20:17.131+02:002010-12-13T17:20:17.131+02:00My office is overly warm today, if it makes you fe...My office is overly warm today, if it makes you feel any better.FGFMhttp://twitter.com/FGFMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-55938978756246564002010-12-13T16:57:59.274+02:002010-12-13T16:57:59.274+02:00Go play in traffic, shit-for-brains.Go play in traffic, shit-for-brains.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-14084480311582183692010-12-13T16:48:28.137+02:002010-12-13T16:48:28.137+02:00I think FGFM imagines this "decent" scht...<i>I think FGFM imagines this "decent" schtick to be more irritating and clever than it actually is. I'm not at all sure he realises how tediously unimaginative and boring it makes him. Maybe he does, and just doesn't care, which is distinctly depressing.</i><br /><br />Decent declares something!FGFMhttp://twitter.com/FGFMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-71563399561156890802010-12-13T15:35:37.862+02:002010-12-13T15:35:37.862+02:00I think FGFM imagines this "decent" scht...I think FGFM imagines this "decent" schtick to be more irritating and clever than it actually is. I'm not at all sure he realises how tediously unimaginative and boring it makes him. Maybe he does, and just doesn't care, which is distinctly depressing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-53114907843031091982010-12-13T13:48:45.098+02:002010-12-13T13:48:45.098+02:00Mad Decent.Mad Decent.FGFMhttp://twitter.com/FGFMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-18282162903612410702010-12-13T09:24:07.627+02:002010-12-13T09:24:07.627+02:00"It's so crowded that no one goes there a..."It's so crowded that no one goes there anymore."<br /><br />Nah, that should be "Nobody goes there anymore; it's too crowded"<br /><br />Semi-colon alert.Peterhttp://nj#hnn@hm.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-38334614875519145022010-12-13T04:16:12.701+02:002010-12-13T04:16:12.701+02:00"Anyway, you're obviously too stupid to l..."Anyway, you're obviously too stupid to learn anything..."<br /><br />I doubt there's anything you could teach me. Not the same thing as being incapable of learning anything.HJnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-16868533649092851802010-12-13T04:02:57.263+02:002010-12-13T04:02:57.263+02:00Who would want to write like Faulkner? Anyway, you...Who would want to write like Faulkner? Anyway, you're obviously too stupid to learn anything...Mark Gnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-57824706846769990592010-12-13T03:20:54.573+02:002010-12-13T03:20:54.573+02:00No difference of opinion? Didn't you see my la...<i>No difference of opinion? Didn't you see my latest?</i><br /><br />Hitchens, "lame ass" attempt to "pile on"! Not exactly Faulkner, is it?<br /><br />What do we learn about your opinons? Hitchens is old, Hitchens is reactionary, Hithcnes is against free speech. I hate Hitchens! Why do I read Hitchens? Blah blah blah...<br /><br />And what do we read form Hidari? That Hitchens' opposition to WikiLeaks is proof that Hitchens is racist? Eh? Come again?<br /><br />Well, Hitchens only disagrees when "brown people" try to suppress freedom of speech like when the Ayatollah did it. Hmmmm...?<br /><br />Do we gather from this that Hidair has no problem with the fatwa? Or in fact that he has to support it lest anyone think he's racist? Eh? Weird! Nevermind that Salman Rushdie was the potential victim of the fatwa. No, he doesn't count! Why not? He was a Cambridge student? Eh? What? This sounds like FGFM explaining his theory that Hitchens is a Republican.HJnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-6775384474077203552010-12-13T02:13:03.848+02:002010-12-13T02:13:03.848+02:00To put in language you can understand: go take a l...To put in language you can understand: go take a long walk off a short pier, you talentless bore. And take your goofy sidekick Mark G with you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-72383912734412423812010-12-13T01:45:08.205+02:002010-12-13T01:45:08.205+02:00What the Capplehitch!
Yeesh … Now He Tells Us!
B...What the Capplehitch!<br /><br /><a href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/34093.html" rel="nofollow">Yeesh … Now He Tells Us!</a><br /><br />Bottle-scarred veteran of the Sending-Other-People-Off-To-Die-In-Wars Wars Christopher Hitchens has apparently stumbled off his barstool and wandered outside for a smoke (‘kazzle-frazzle Liberal anti-smoking law fascists mumble-grumble …’) and lo and behold! There’s a bunch of total fucking nutters gaining real political power in this country!FGFMhttp://twitter.com/FGFMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-15375153835870828542010-12-13T01:41:33.595+02:002010-12-13T01:41:33.595+02:00It's so crowded that no one goes there anymore...It's so crowded that no one goes there anymore.FGFMhttp://twitter.com/FGFMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-79921325305949186012010-12-12T23:08:23.895+02:002010-12-12T23:08:23.895+02:00What the Cappleman!
Guess no one is visiting Hitch...What the Cappleman!<br />Guess no one is visiting Hitchens Watch anymore (probably because the proprietors banned most commenters), so the FGFMs and Mark Gs now have to come here to make themselves heard. At any rate, isn't it time FGFM updated Pat Condell Watch? Such a wonderful site, that.Peterhttp://hj@hj.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-35400072281878787652010-12-12T22:56:01.264+02:002010-12-12T22:56:01.264+02:00Did that one come before or after you gleefully ap...Did that one come before or after you gleefully applauded FGFM (your latest mentor)'s internet detective work? You know, the pics of Hitchens daughter. If afterwards, don't be surprised no one's seen it. The "post a Hitch chick pic" stunt moved your horrible project from weird to depraved. Go yell on a street corner. More people are likely to pay attention. That site of yours is dead.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-23168608861229563102010-12-12T22:16:09.580+02:002010-12-12T22:16:09.580+02:00No difference of opinion? Didn't you see my la...No difference of opinion? Didn't you see my latest? http://christopherhitchenswatch.blogspot.com/2010/12/hitchens-lame-ass-attempt-to-pile-on.htmlMark Gnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-68299443307067913882010-12-12T16:44:41.450+02:002010-12-12T16:44:41.450+02:00Why would you use cliches on purpose? Solidarity w...Why would you use cliches on purpose? Solidarity w/ FGFM? Or were you joining in the fun, making sport of ol' shit for brains? Have you abandoned FGFM like you abandoned Hitchens? Are you no longer under FGFM's spell?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-58660378099173630132010-12-12T13:50:21.922+02:002010-12-12T13:50:21.922+02:00Dim rides again.Dim rides again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-42623043610232521612010-12-12T09:29:38.040+02:002010-12-12T09:29:38.040+02:00"I was still under Hitch's spell"
D..."I was still under Hitch's spell"<br /><br />Decent man-crush!<br /><br />"Jesus. You guys are rabid. Especially you HJ."<br /><br />Not sure what your problem is, Mark. Do you find my remarks too nasty or something? There are some quotes form you about sticking people in electric chairs for supporting a war or sticking metal pipes up Hitchens ass. Not to mention your Decent-staliking of people you don't like!<br /><br />I don't write on your demented site that everything you write is wrong or obvious or anything like that. It is YOU who makes a special effort to read and criticize everything that Hitchens has ever written and you don't criticize his work because of any difference of opinion you have of his articles but purely because HE wrote it!HJnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-28566849793567342512010-12-12T09:11:55.293+02:002010-12-12T09:11:55.293+02:00Jesus. You guys are rabid. Especially you HJ. Mayb...Jesus. You guys are rabid. Especially you HJ. Maybe you should try to calm down a bit? Seriously.<br /><br />Noting the riot above, I used the cliches on purpose. Thought you'd get it...shoulda known better. <br /><br />It doesn't bother me, by the way, that you quote my stuff from over 6 years ago when I was still under Hitch's spell like you. Others have tried this trick against me in the past as well. I like it. At least I now admit I was dead wrong about the guy.Mark Gnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-61291922005847190812010-12-12T08:32:00.522+02:002010-12-12T08:32:00.522+02:00I think we're really starting to see the manif...I think we're really starting to see the manifesto of the Hitchens Watch. Even if the great man writes something that they cannot disagree with or that they cannot take issue with it must be denigrated as something that "anyone" could write. This is coming from "Mark G" who can't write anything without looking ludircous.HJnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-90297192866558566952010-12-12T08:26:23.641+02:002010-12-12T08:26:23.641+02:00Shooting fish in a barrel. Old hat. Anyone could&#...<i>Shooting fish in a barrel. Old hat. Anyone could've written this article, and many can and have done it much better.<br /><br /></i><br /><br />Pop Quiz time!<br /><br />Who wrote:<br /><br />" Hitchens enjoyed practicing his French with the staff, communicating our requests, as it were, in their native tongue. I find the firebrand provocateur Christopher Hitchens, in reality, to be an unusually polite, generous and rather sensitive man."<br /><br />No Googling, now!HJnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-18409922882659192812010-12-12T05:14:30.455+02:002010-12-12T05:14:30.455+02:00True. That contribution by Mark G consists entirel...True. That contribution by Mark G consists entirely of cliches. He has achieved negative perfection. Remarkable.Xnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-74782088353709247892010-12-12T05:10:27.034+02:002010-12-12T05:10:27.034+02:00"Shoot the wounded"..."fish in a ba..."Shoot the wounded"..."fish in a barrel".."old hat"...<br /><br />Do they require devotion to cliche at Hitchenswatch? Or is it just a coincidence that people who show irrational hatred for Hitchens can't manage an original thought?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com