tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post2209371162131982886..comments2023-12-19T04:24:35.912+02:00Comments on Daily Hitchens: Results of the Munk Debate on ReligionUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger52125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-10714188760412621722011-01-13T14:24:45.363+02:002011-01-13T14:24:45.363+02:00I think the figures would paint a better picture i...I think the figures would paint a better picture if all voters were initially undecided.Sherlocknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-21778258057027536652010-12-06T14:14:03.069+02:002010-12-06T14:14:03.069+02:00Decent poet.Decent poet.FGFMhttp://twitter.com/FGFMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-49470801924095802152010-12-06T06:35:25.756+02:002010-12-06T06:35:25.756+02:00Sure. And this one's even got a name: "Je...Sure. And this one's even got a name: "Jewel". So pretty.<br /><br />"FGFM and Jewel sitting in a tree..."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-55852243578147717652010-12-06T05:57:17.911+02:002010-12-06T05:57:17.911+02:00Decent Internet Shadchan!Decent Internet Shadchan!FGFMhttp://twitter.com/FGFMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-44444106074626667412010-12-06T05:00:45.019+02:002010-12-06T05:00:45.019+02:00She's just your type. Ain't love grand?She's just your type. Ain't love grand?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-15025140008206587262010-12-06T04:18:03.530+02:002010-12-06T04:18:03.530+02:00Decent has a theory!Decent has a theory!FGFMhttp://twitter.com/FGFMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-55164470195023667832010-12-06T03:43:32.557+02:002010-12-06T03:43:32.557+02:00Oh look, the creep's finally got a date.Oh look, the creep's finally got a date.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-46282497778611407632010-12-05T20:18:04.255+02:002010-12-05T20:18:04.255+02:00You're an incorrigble [sic] idiot.
What the C...<i>You're an incorrigble [sic] idiot.</i><br /><br /><a href="http://twitpic.com/3d8iqi" rel="nofollow">What the Capplesteak</a>!FGFMhttp://twitter.com/FGFMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-66253756988611523112010-12-05T16:24:35.573+02:002010-12-05T16:24:35.573+02:00You're an incorrigble idiot.You're an incorrigble idiot.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-48976512723398491972010-12-05T16:18:56.495+02:002010-12-05T16:18:56.495+02:00It's a steak until you roast it, and then it&#...<i>It's a steak until you roast it, and then it's, well, still a steak, actually.</i><br /><br />You don't roast steaks. Steaks are typically broiled.FGFMhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roastingnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-84851921876346895042010-12-05T14:36:53.397+02:002010-12-05T14:36:53.397+02:00It's a steak until you roast it, and then it&#...It's a steak until you roast it, and then it's, well, still a steak, actually. <br /><br />Bone appahteat, you ill-bred moron.99th Percentilehttp://I'm rich too.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-44695440674446403852010-12-05T12:56:13.054+02:002010-12-05T12:56:13.054+02:00@James: and also.. how do you define what constitu...@James: and also.. how do you define what constitutes a win? We can only go by solid, recorded, observed evidence at hand. The only parameter that gives us that is the UNDECIDED %. We can only guess and argue over the AGREE / DISAGREE % change.. to no avail. I grant you maybe 1% shifted sides one way or another.. but we can't define the condition for a 'win' based on that 'supposed' assumption. <br /><br />But since the UNDECIDED contingent of the attendees was required to choose either side, I take that as the only indicator (however poor it may be..) of the debate's outcome. Of course you could bring very valid points as to how the organizers managed the %...vladbnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-63978936025659087222010-12-05T12:48:12.600+02:002010-12-05T12:48:12.600+02:00@James: not exactly correct. There's no tellin...@James: not exactly correct. There's no telling how many people switched their original side. The only definite value to look at is the original undecided % and final %. Hitch won over twice as many (13 vs 7) undecided as Blair.. that means Hitch's argument was more persuasive. Obviously since there was a greater % of people already on Hitch side would make that swing look comparatively smaller.vladbnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-59624429808320827402010-12-05T08:29:54.035+02:002010-12-05T08:29:54.035+02:00FGFM, what a weirdo you are!FGFM, what a weirdo you are!HJnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-44002138082311032712010-12-05T06:45:47.265+02:002010-12-05T06:45:47.265+02:00Beef Chuck
arm roast = arm pot roast = arm chuck ...<a href="http://sonic.net/~alden/MeatBeefChuck.html" rel="nofollow">Beef Chuck</a><br /><br />arm roast = arm pot roast = arm chuck roast = chuck arm roast = round bone pot roast = round bone roast Notes: This is just a butcher's blade away from the shoulder roast, and the main difference between the two is that the arm roast has a round bone in it and is slightly more tender. You can use this for a pot roast, or cut it up for stew meat, but it's too tough to cook with dry heat. A steak cut from this roast is called an arm steak. <br /><br />---<br /><br />'Cause it's a roast, not a steak!FGFMhttp://twitter.com/FGFMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-14939300696131486042010-12-05T05:53:57.733+02:002010-12-05T05:53:57.733+02:00I'm absolutely repulsive! Even the Lib Dems ca...I'm absolutely repulsive! Even the Lib Dems can't stand me!FGFMhttp://uptownbarbershop.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-3044141115382158582010-12-05T04:45:26.018+02:002010-12-05T04:45:26.018+02:00Prime chuck roast, got it!Prime chuck roast, got it!FGFMhttp://www.ehow.com/how_2159336_perfect-chuck-roast.htmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-24743145515067662462010-12-05T03:21:06.764+02:002010-12-05T03:21:06.764+02:00I enjoy fondling squirrels' naughty bits.I enjoy fondling squirrels' naughty bits.FGFMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-89172037890289139762010-12-04T23:33:08.630+02:002010-12-04T23:33:08.630+02:00Indeed.Indeed.FG "That's not a steak" FMhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGqw2gu1zX8noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-4697281091269180232010-12-04T23:20:37.492+02:002010-12-04T23:20:37.492+02:00What the Cappleroast!What the Cappleroast!FGFMhttp://twitter.com/FGFMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-58439421399413237782010-12-04T21:01:32.993+02:002010-12-04T21:01:32.993+02:00http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_steak
Idiot.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_steak<br /><br />Idiot.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-11114680549290288012010-12-04T20:06:49.425+02:002010-12-04T20:06:49.425+02:00When calculating undecided votes, I don't thin...When calculating undecided votes, I don't think it's appropriate to assume that they would be more likely to disagree with the motion just because more of the people who were decided already have (55% vs 25%). We should take them at their word that they are undecided.<br /><br />So I don't think Hitchens has the obligation to convince more people based on how many people already opposed the motion. The only appropriate measure would be compare the total amount of individuals each speaker was able to convince.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-72256993031377331512010-12-04T20:03:14.097+02:002010-12-04T20:03:14.097+02:00That's not a steak, idiot.That's not a steak, idiot.FGFMhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pot_roast_%28beef%29noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-50654933900460745082010-12-04T18:16:20.734+02:002010-12-04T18:16:20.734+02:00A five dollar supermarket steak? I thought you wer...A five dollar supermarket steak? I thought you were meant to be rich?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073647307948118016.post-43126468435790260252010-12-04T17:45:37.072+02:002010-12-04T17:45:37.072+02:00Cooking for one!<a href="http://twitpic.com/3cjslo" rel="nofollow">Cooking for one</a>!FGFMhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymathnoreply@blogger.com